|
Demystifying the recent decisions with regard to Patents in India --- Several Topics For Discussion ---- Gradually, people are realizing complexity of Indian Patent Prosecution, which may be shown as the general prosecution route . India has the organization structure with respect to the intellectural properties. India has four patent offices domestically. Japanese applicants has filed so many patent applications and it is still growing. The following are the topics to be explained in detail. 1. Recent Judicial judgments; 2．Recent IPAB decision with regard to mandatory requirement of “Proof of Right” from the inventor; 3. Submission of Information of Official Actions issued in family applications abroad; 4. Filing of Statement of Working; 5. Post grant opposition / Revocation; and 6. Compulsory Licensing. For example, Roche v. Cipla case(2012), Sugen v. Cipla case (2013), Fresenius Kabi Oncology Limited v. Glaxo Group Limited case (2013), Ajanta Pharma v. Allergan Inc case (2013), Ajanta Pharma v. Allergan Inc. case(2013), and so on may be introduced. Lecturer: Mr. Rajan Ailavadi, Esq. Firm: CIP LEGIT Sponsor: Orion International Patent Office - Ikebukuro If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Aikawa. DATE: March 6, 2014 (Thu) from 6:30pm to 8:30pm Venue: JPAA (next to JPO) 2F, Conference AB Costs: None |
|
 |
|
 |
JPO |
Top page／Back／Next
 | Contact |