US Patent Seminar


Taiwan Patent - 7 Points You Should Know

---Great Value in Taiwan Patent ---      


1. 800 TWD reduction from official fee if English abstract prepared. 2. 600 TWD reduction from official fee if electronically filed. 3. One more opportunity to respond could be said to be obtained if Examiner interview is requested in first examination and in re-examination for resolving rejection reason. 4. Examination on the merit for both novelty and inventiveness is made even with multi-multi claim. 5. Divisional application may be filed upon allowance in re-examination even if notice of rejection is received in re-examination. 6. Allowance rate is more than 90% if PPH is requested based on Japanese registered patent. 7. Shifting- or enlarging-amendment may be made unless final notice of rejection is received.
After the seminar, these questions may be answered!?

Unique Utilization of Taiwan Utility Model

--- Advantageous Taiwan Utility Model ---      


1. Can be registered soon after formality examination and be used for lawsuit without Utility Model Technical Evaluation Report. 2. Not much difference from patent in success rate of invalidity defense in civil action (patent: 45% utility model: 55%). 3. Same invention can be applied in both patent and utility model. Quick acquisition of right and continuing rights (of utility model and patent) are possible. 4. Can be used for advertisement as utility model is represented by "patent". 5. Lower amount of damages is not necessarily in civil action because of utility model.

Japanese Kanji Trademark Certification and Hashtag Judgment

--- Taiwan Trademark Ruling ---      


A. Japanese-language trademarks in Taiwan are not examined as graphic marks, but as character trademarks. Chinese characters are used in both Taiwan and Japan, while some Chinese characters have different meanings in Chinese and Japanese, the meanings of some Japanese characters are recognized by consumers. Then, it is an issue whether the relevant examination should be judged in the Chinese meaning or in the Japanese meaning. The relevant circumstances and measures to deal with them will be explained.
Discussion may be made whether these are distinctive.

The seminar will be given in Japanese. And Mr. Aikawa will be a moderator.

Lecturer :
Mr. J. W. Cheng
Mr. Lynn Chung
Mr. Y. C. Chuang
Firm : Louis International Patent Office

Sponsor: Orion International Patent Office - Ikebukuro
Reservation is required. Please contact Mr. Aikawa.

DATE: December 8, 2023 (Fri) from 6:30pm to 8:30pm
Venue: JPAA (next to JPO) B1, Conference AB
Costs: None
Reception with beer and snacks after the seminar.


Updated: September 17, 2023




Japanese Page
US Patent License Seminar (April 18, 2003)
US Patent License Strategy Seminar (August 6, 2003)
Employee's Invention Seminar (October 15, 2003)
US Patent Doctrine of Equivalent Seminar (February 18, 2004)
US Patent Claim Language & IDS Seminar (April 9, 2004)
US Patent Claim Drafting Seminar (October 29, 2004)
Aftermath of Knorr-Bremse v. Dana Corp.(November 19, 2004)
Strategy For Solid Patent Portfolio (June 15, 2005)
What You Should Know About the US Patent Law Reform Bill (October 28, 2005)
Introduction to Patent Court Decisions: Basics of Common Law - Search and Contruction for US Patent Court Decisions(May 11, 2006)
Brown Bag Luncheon Seminar (May 16, 2006)
Proposed Rule Change before USPTO (November 16, 2006)
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (March 28, 2007)
Utilizing MPEP (September 4, 2007)
US Patent New Rules (September 10, 2007)
Development of US Patent Reform & Practice by Federal Legisrative, Court, and Government (December 6, 2007)
Recent Developments in European Patent Law and Practice EPC2000 (February 20, 2008)
Practical Guide to Successful Licesing (May 13, 2008)
US-Japan Written Requirement Comparison (BEST MODE) (October 21, 2008)
Indian Patent System (February 25, 2009)
CAFC Decision on USPTO Rule Making (April 9, 2009)
Recent Information of US Patent (October 5, 2009)
Recent Trend of Examination of Computer-Related Invention at USPTO and CAFC (April 21, 2010)
Avoidable Pitfalls in Claim Drafting of European Patent Applications (October 14, 2010)
US Patent Recent Topics Momnibus (November 12, 2010)
Ten Most Common Mistakes that Japanese Practitioners Make When Drafting United States (May 17, 2011)
Hot Topics in US Patent Prosecution (September 15 (Osaka) and 16 (Tokyo), 2011)
Most Important IP Developments in India over Past 12 Months (September 30, 2011)
Important Points in EP Patent Application Drafting and Prosecution (October 13, 2011 (Osaka))
How to obtain quick and effective patent protection in Europe (November 10, 2011)
Practical Impact of the AIA on Patent Prosecution/Filing Strategy (November 15, 2012)
Special Topics Peculiar to India Patent Prosecution (October 25, 2013)
Demystifying the recent decisions with regard to Patents in India (March 6, 2014)
Important decisions of EPO (May 13, 2014)
US Patent Application Seminar With Key Points (December 8, 2014)
Tricks for US Patent Prosecution including Replying to AIA actions (March 27, 2015)
AVOIDING PROBLEMS WITH NEW MATTER IN EUROPE (July 1, 2015)
Patent Litigation Strategies in Europe (June 3, 2016)
EP application vs. DE application (December 1, 2016)
Intellectual Property Protection in Southeast Asia (April 20, 2017)
Partial priority of a European patent application (May 9, 2017)
Ten Important Points for US Patent Practices (July 12, 2017)
How to Draft Claims in view of Patent Litigation in China (January 22, 2018)
IP Attorney Practice Tips for Counseling Technology Startups (May 11, 2018)
Should You Appeal? (March 29, 2019)
New Features of Intellectual Property Cases in China (June 19, 2019)
The Application of Law and Case Study on the Prevention of Malicious Trademark Registration (June 20, 2019)
Benrishi Kaikan - Head Office




Please contact Mr. Aikawa.